adverts

Names for formula feeders v names for breastfeeders

names people call formula and breastfeeding mumsThe list of names that breastfeeding mums get called was taken from the media, from recent articles, in the 21st Century. The only derogatory term I could think of for a formula feeding mum was a DFF – a Defensive Formula Feeder and I haven’t seen that in the press anywhere.

Now much as I like to take a ladder to get up on my high horse and view my moral highground I really wish the imbalance of names wasn’t true. It’s really truly awful being linked to the Holocaust, it’s unneccesary and it’s disrespectful to those that lived and died through it.

I wish that names were not called and we could just get on with it.

Media, listen up and stop being nasty little children, play nice.

Media request – mums who have been treated unfairly when breastfeeding in public

Please respond to Andi from Channel 5 not on this post as I won’t be around to pass messages on.

Dear Lisa

I’m contacting you from The Wright Stuff Extra, a daytime spin off of The Wright Stuff, hosted by Gabby Logan every weekday morning on Channel 5 from 11.10am

On tomorrow’s show, to mark World Breastfeeding Week, we’ll be talking about breastfeeding in public and people’s attitudes towards it.  We sent a camera crew to Romford in Essex to a cafe there that has joined Havering Council’s Breastfeeding Friendly Scheme (a scheme many other council’s are starting up too).

After we’ve shown the short film we’ll come back to the studio and I was wondering if you knew of any mum’s who had maybe been treated unfairly when breastfeeding in public.  Perhaps they have been asked to leave or go to into a toilet, or whatever.  It would be good if you knew of somebody who would be willing to talk with Gabby over the phone about their experience to continue the debate about people’s attitudes towards public feeding.

Many thanks

Andi

Andi McLellan | Assistant Producer: The Wright Stuff Extra | Princess Productions, 3rd Floor. Whiteley’s Centre, 151 Queensway, London W2 4YN | T: 0207 985 1834 E: andi.mclellan@princesstv.com

The BMJ press release that started the media madness

The British Medical Journal are saying via Twitter that the published analysis  ‘Six months of exclusive breast feeding: how good is the evidence?’ is an opinion piece that has been interpreted differently in the press.

This is the press release the BMJ sent out.

Contact: Emma Dickinson
edickinson@bmjgroup.com
44-020-738-36529
BMJ-British Medical Journal

Is ‘breast only’ for first 6 months best?

Analysis: 6 months of exclusive breast feeding: How good is the evidence?

Current guidance advising mothers in the UK to exclusively breast feed for the first six months of their baby’s life is being questioned by child health experts on bmj.com today.

The authors, led by Dr Mary Fewtrell, a consultant paediatrician at the UCL Institute of Child Health in London, have reviewed the evidence behind the current guidance and say the time is right to reappraise this recommendation.

The researchers stress that while they fully back exclusive breast feeding early in life, they are concerned that exclusively doing so for six months and not introducing other foods may not always be in the child’s best interests.

In 2001 the World Health Organisation (WHO) made its global recommendation that infants should be exclusively breast fed for the first six months. Many western countries did not follow this recommendation but in 2003 the UK health minister announced that the UK would comply.

Fewtrell and colleagues support six months exclusive breast feeding in less developed countries where access to clean water and safe weaning foods is limited and there is a high risk of infant death and illness. However they have reservations about whether the WHO’s guidance about when to introduce other foods is right for the UK.

The WHO’s recommendation that mothers should breast feed exclusively for six months is largely based on a systematic review undertaken in 2000 that considered existing research in this area, say the authors. This review concluded that exclusively breast fed babies have fewer infections and that the babies experience no growth problems.

Dr Fewtrell argues that the evidence that breast milk alone provides sufficient nutrition for six months is questionable. She says there is a higher risk of iron deficiency anaemia if babies are exclusively breast fed and that there could also be a higher incidence of celiac disease and food allergies if children are not introduced to certain solid foods before six months.

The authors also fear that prolonged exclusive breast feeding may reduce the window for introducing new tastes, particularly bitter taste which may be important in the later acceptance of green leafy vegetables. This could encourage unhealthy eating in later life and lead to obesity, they say.

Fewtrell and colleagues conclude that it is time to review the UK’s guidance in the light of the evidence that has built up on this issue over the last ten years.

http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-01/bmj-io011311.php

###

Media request – wanted, a mum thinking of giving up breastfeeding

BBC3 are filming a documentary about peoples experiences of breastfeeding and they would really like to have a Boobie Whisperer bit where they help someone who is struggling with breastfeeding and who is seriously thinking of stopping.

The mum would get lots of help with any problems she might have and would have to agree to being filmed breastfeeding.

Please contact directly instead of replying to this post -  livia.simoka@renegadepictures.co.uk if you can help.

BBC Northern Ireland ~ Talkback



(this image has been authorised by Wendy Austin
for free use and by Wendy Austin’s management
and uploaded by Austenlennon~
Austenlennon 17:15, 6 October 2007 (UTC)
austenlennon with full permissions.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Wendy_austin.jpg)

Some of you will have seen a link on the DBM Facebook page to an item which was broadcast last week on Radio Ulster concerning breastfeeding.  The programme is presented by Wendy Austin.

A DBM member brought it to my attention and I have made a complaint to the BBC via their website.  The complaint that I sent is copied below.

During the course of the programme the tone was very negative in regards to breastfeeding, and the language used by the presenter was offensive, seeming to label breastfeeding advocates ‘breastfeeding gestapo’ on more than one occasion.  Northern Ireland has the lowest breastfeeding rates in the United Kingdom, and despite valiant efforts in some quarters, only a tiny minority of mothers breastfeed.  With local press coverage like this, it’s not hard to see why.

If anyone else wishes to make a similar complaint you can do so (fairly quickly!) here, or if you’d like to hear the broadcast (it’s only available online until Friday so you’ve got to be quick!) the link is hereYou need to scroll to about 42 minutes in & the piece lasts about ten minutes in total.  

 I’m writing to express my concern about an item broadcast last Friday as part of your ‘Talkback’ programme with Wendy Austin.

 I feel that the section regarding breastfeeding failed to present a balanced range of opinions and not only represented breastfeeding unfairly, but also cause offenced to breastfeeding advocates in the community by repeated use of the words ‘breastfeeding gestapo’ and ‘mafia’. The programme link is here: http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00twxhw/Talkback_01_10_2010/ and the section to which I refer starts at about 42 minutes in.

 Several people were interviewed during the course of the item. None of them had (apparently) any breastfeeding training or represented the breastfeeding community. I also feel that it failed to acknowledge or discuss any of the efforts being made to SUPPORT mothers in our communities – much of which is done on a voluntary basis.

 During the course of the discussion it became clear to me that the presenter had an agenda which was fairly ‘anti’ breastfeeding and despite the fact that several of the commentators called breastfeeding ‘best’ they then went to to simply discuss negatives. Many mothers do face difficulties, but most of these can be overcome swiftly with access to good support and many mothers (myself included) continue to enjoy a happy nursing relationship, a good social life and work too! I am sure it would have been possible to approach breastfeeding mothers for an alternative viewpoint if you had wanted to. For the presented to invite ‘members of the breastfeeding gestapo’ to ring in a put their points of view was simply offensive – who was going to call in when that was the agenda?

 There was much discussion about the ‘inconvenience’ of breastfeeding, and none about the dangers related to formula feeding and the inconvenience that can bring. There was no discussion about mother’s rights in the workplace with regards to lactation breaks and expressing which many mothers would have found very helpful I’m sure.

 I also feel that new mothers who might be considering breastfeeding (which is in fact not the ‘best’ but simply the ‘normal’ way to feed a human baby!) might have been put-off by the very negative attitude of the guests and the presenter. This has health implications for both them and their babies.

 In regard to the programmes obligations under the broadcasting code, I feel that there were a few areas where issue can be taken.

 Firstly, section 2:

 http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/harmoffence/

2.3 In applying generally accepted standards broadcasters must ensure that material which may cause offence is justified by the context (see meaning of “context” below). Such material may include, but is not limited to, offensive language, violence, sex, sexual violence, humiliation, distress, violation of human dignity, discriminatory treatment or language (for example on the grounds of age, disability, gender, race, religion, beliefs and sexual orientation). Appropriate information should also be broadcast where it would assist in avoiding or minimising offence.

I feel that the use of the word ‘breastfeeding gestapo’ on at least two occasions constitutes offensive language, and that appropriate information to balance the discussion was not presented. This could have been in the form of a proper contribution from a breastfeeding mother with a positive story of her breastfeeding experience (not simply the short voxpops at the start!) and by having a healthcare professional give correct information in relation to the subject being discussed. No-one was there to challenge the use of the offensive terms, and asking members of the ‘breastfeeding gestapo’ to phone in does not, in my view, enhance fairness.

 In addition, I believe that section 5 of the code was also not adhered to:

  http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/broadcasting/broadcast-codes/broadcast-code/impartiality/

5.9 Presenters and reporters (with the exception of news presenters and reporters in news programmes), presenters of “personal view” or “authored” programmes or items, and chairs of discussion programmes may express their own views on matters of political or industrial controversy or matters relating to current public policy. However, alternative viewpoints must be adequately represented either in the programme, or in a series of programmes taken as a whole. Additionally, presenters must not use the advantage of regular appearances to promote their views in a way that compromises the requirement for due impartiality. Presenter phone-ins must encourage and must not exclude alternative views.

 I do not feel the programme represented a range of views. I feel a very one-sided agenda was persued. Wendy Austin’s use of demeaning language did not invite alternative views.

 5.10 A personal view or authored programme or item must be clearly signalled to the audience at the outset. This is a minimum requirement and may not be sufficient in all circumstances. (Personality phone-in hosts on radio are exempted from this provision unless their personal view status is unclear.)

 Wendy Austin did not state clearly her opinion on the subject although it could be argued that it became apparrent as the programme progressed both through her ‘leading’ the guests and her choice of words. She did not appear, to me, to be impartial.

If BBCNI wish to redress the balance I suggest there are a number of places they could start. 

First of all, you might wish to do another piece, this time showing the alternative viewpoint.

 I think in the interests of fairness you might involve other representatives from the community onboard to give their experiences. You will find that not everyone has a negative breastfeeding experience to relate.

 I look forward to hearing from you.

 Best regards,

 

‘Dispelling Breastfeeding Myths’ Project



Training to be a Breastfeeding Peer Counsellor – week 6

Dear Granny

Mummy is breastfeeding me because she knows it’s best
But I expect you’re wanting to help her get some rest

I’m very time consuming because I am so new
I know how much you want to help – there’s lots that you can do

Washing, cooking, ironing – you can think of more
Let Mummy do the feeding ‘cos that is not a chore

Both Mum and I need practice until we get the knack
So please don’t say “Good gracious! Another little snack?”

Granny, you’ve got lots of tips – for you are very wise
We welcome your suggestions – but please don’t criticise

You were once like Mummy and now her turn has come
With your love and patience she’ll make a smashing Mum!

Gill Rapley, 1995

This week we had a lively discussion about ‘Barriers to Breastfeeding’. This is obviously a topic of wide-ranging issues and many of the issues raised struck a chord with one or more of the mums in the group.
What sorts of things prevent mums from having a positive experience of breastfeeding? I suppose a large proportion of them can be seen as cultural (in some ways all of them can). For instance: formula and baby-bottle marketing; attitudes of hospital staff; lack of positive role models in the media; attitudes of work-mates and, that old chestnut, ‘Old Wive’s Tales’ (how many have we heard?).

The influence of society and culture around us is so strong though, that it is almost impossible not to internalise the attitudes and the words of those around us. Many fears are instilled in women which become a real barrier to breastfeeding ’successfully’. For example: a fear of pain; of losing freedom; of a change in body-shape; or simply a fear of failure.

For any woman about to become a mother who fears the changes that are inevitable, some sort of support is essential.
If difficulties do arise in the first few days or weeks of breastfeeding (and for many they do), some women find that the solutions offered to them in our culture do not involve continuing breasfeeding. Family, friends and the media may convince the mother that she will have less pain, more sleep, more normality, if she bottle-feeds her baby.

Again, this led me to think that this is about more than just breastfeeding. As one mum told me about formula milk cartons, I found myself thinking, ‘How convenient!’ – then stopping myself with a huge red light: ‘What am I thinking?! What could be more convenient than breastfeeding?’
This culture, that we are a part of, is so wrapped up in consumerism that we can be easily convinced that we need this, or that, to help us fit into our societal roles. So many things come in a package to make our life easier that we have forgotten one of the most important skills that we have as human beings – adaptation.

The instructor told us that she has visited many mums who have asked her, ‘When will life get back to normal?’ Maybe they haven’t realised that what they are describing as ‘normal’ is actually ‘life without a baby’. Life with a new baby hasn’t met their expectations, because those expectations have been shaped by our modern culture.
Of course, having a baby (especially the first time) is a shock to us all – and so we all need support to embrace the change, adapt and find our own parenting style.

It doesn’t help when a midwife on the post-natal ward tells you your baby needs a bottle of formula, because he is hungry, and then presents you with said bottle and the expectation that you will give it to your baby – the experience of at least one mum in our group.
Or when a new mum is told by hospital staff that her baby must experience a bottle before he is a few weeks old, or he may never take one (and you wouldn’t want that, would you?).

Fortunately, our local hospital has now begun UNICEF training programmes, to work towards the ‘Baby-Friendly’ status. This should make some positive changes to delivery, baby, post-natal and children’s wards. Let’s hope that someone sees the sense in passing that information on to all hospital staff. They must remember that all mothers in hospital for non-infectious conditions have a right to breastfeed too.

For some mothers, the choice to breastfeed couldn’t be more difficult. Medical opinion may strongly advise against breastfeeding for mothers who are HIV positive or who are taking medicines or drugs, but it is still the mother’s decision to make.
Our instructor explained that she feels her position, as a medical professional, is to give information to the mother (or parents), so that they can make their own decision. Then she (our instructor) will respect and support that decision, even if she feels it is not the decision she would have made herself.
The exception to that would be where an issue of child protection exists and I asked if, by choosing to breastfeed against medical opinion when HIV +ve, would that be considered a child protection issue? We were told that only evidence of child abuse occurring – not ‘potential risks’ – would be an issue for us to report.

I also asked if any changes had been made to the level of support given to antenatal women undergoing a HIV test in pregnancy. None have.
Many years ago, I had a HIV test in a London clinic, because I was travelling to an Israeli kibbutz and I knew I would be tested there. In the London clinic, I was given counselling before the test (which reassured me that the behaviour which I had perceived as high risk was, in fact, quite low risk), followed by more counselling before receiving the results and after receiving the results. This high level of care really helped me to deal with the anxiety involved in taking the test.
In current ante-natal screening , mums-to-be receive no counselling at all – unless the test comes back positive, then they are referred to the hospital (but, by then, they have already been given the awful news).
I wonder if this procedure is regional?

Another aspect of parenting that some mums in the group felt the medical establishment needed to catch up on was that of co-sleeping. Although our instructor explained that many professionals accept that mums choose to sleep with their babies, the information given out remains extremely cautious on the subject. My favourite warning is: ‘Do not sleep with your baby if you are excessively tired’ – surely that is exactly when most parents begin co-sleeping!
The implication of the information is still that every parent’s aim should be to have a baby safely sleeping all night through in their cot, even though there is much evidence to suggest that co-sleeping encourages breastfeeding and attentive parenting – particularly in the work of Dr.Sears.

This has been a very long blog this week – following some really enjoyable discussions in the group. If you still have a few moments left, it would be great to see your comments.
Many of the mums in the group have said that they wish they had been on this course when they started breastfeeding and I wondered:
What do you know now that you wish you’d known when you started out on your breastfeeding journey?

Juno